Friday, March 8, 2013

Statesmen vs. Politician Part II


Ward 3 is a totally different story than the Ward 1 race, there are three candidates running and only one with experience in Wentzville city government. One sits in an appointed position on the Board of Aldermen and as much as I like Alderman Cheryl Kross I think flipping on her vote to allow that to happen was her biggest mistake in her time on the Board, we'll see what happens.

Ward 3
Michael Hays (appointed)
Linda L. Wright
Darrel Lackey

Micheal Hays spent several years on the Planning and Zoning board where he and Mayor Nickolas Guccione became friends. Hays was one of the three candidates recruited by Guccione to beat Rick Stokes in the 2012 election  Cutting a deal with Guccione, Hays withdrew his name in favor of becoming the appointed Ward 3 Alderman should Guccione become mayor and vacate his seat, beating Stokes was a long shot anyway.

Everyone knows the story about the long arguments over his appointment to Guccione's vacated seat. "It's my appointment, it's my appointment," he cried over and over and the seat remained vacant for nine months until Kross changed her vote putting a smile on Guccione's face. Guccione will be active in this election bringing the full force of his dirty campaign tactics against Hays' opponents, I know one of his opponents and if things get nasty Hays and Guccione had better brace themselves.

Hays has never campaigned, he's never been in the trenches and is enjoying his appointment to the board at the dismay of many Ward 3 residents who had no choice in his representation. He will be relying heavily on Guccione's campaign machine to beat his more qualified and highly experienced opponent. Guccione and Hays have become thicker than fleas on a hound dog's ears, arriving early to have their clandestine meetings in the mayor's office to plan their strategies. Guccione is parading him all over town including him in all of his mayoral functions. As a resident of Ward 3, I resent the mayor's total lack of care and concerns regarding his Ward 3 constituents.

Linda L. Wright is still an unknown to me. I have heard that she decided to oppose Hays strictly because of the way Guccione handled the appointment and she sounds like a very concerned citizen of Ward 3. I'm not sure how much she will campaign since she now knows that Hays will have a formidable opponent.

Darrel Lackey is no stranger to Wentzville, serving two terms as Mayor, three terms as Alderman of Ward 2, and two terms as Alderman of Ward 3. I had the pleasure of having Lackey represent me and was impressed with his no nonsense attitude toward our City government. He was responsive to citizen requests and concerns throughout his career in Wentzville Government.

Lackey was the butt of Guccione's dirtiest campaign tactics when he ran against him last year for Mayor. It is my belief that if Lackey hadn't entered the race on the last day of registration he would be sitting in the Mayor's office today. Lackey re-entered Wentzville politics winning his first term as Ward 3 Alderman in 2002 when the City was in the grip of the tyrant Mayor Vickie Boedeker where he helped bring a sense of peace back into the City. Deja vu, now we have an unqualified, ineffective mayor, Nickolas Guccione doing his best to throw Wentzville back into the dark ages. Darrel Lackey is not the kind of elected official to pander to special interests or grant favors, he is a common sense legislator who represents his constituents. Lackey left Wentzville Government to run for a seat on the St. Charles County Council.

Municipal Judge
Michael E. Carter vs. Steve Martin (incumbent)

Michael Carter: Michael Carter served as Wentzville's Municipal Judge from 2009 to 2011 when he lost his reelection bid to our current Judge Steve Martin. Carter was disliked by our Police Department due to his habit of reducing fines set by ordinance and releasing prisoners. His actions reduced the police budget so much that our Mayor Lambi and Aldermen took action to limit his authority and even talked of having him removed from office. Carter created an unhealthy and even unsafe environment in our city for the residents of Wentzville because of the disturbance he created in our police department. Carter campaigned actively for Nick Guccione and there's no doubt his support will be reciprocated by the mayor. Many people see judges on the ballot and don't have a clue which one to vote for, be assured, Carter is not the man for Wentzville  If you have thoughts of voting for Carter, ask any Wentzville police officer who served during his term as judge for their opinion of his time on the bench.

Stephen Martin (Incumbent), Judge Martin was elected against a field of six candidates in the 2011 election. His service over the past two years has resulted in the restoration of the Police budget which was almost destroyed by his predecessor. He is revered by the Police Department and City Hall as a good and fair judge. The people should be proud to have Judge Martin on our Municipal Court bench.

According to public record, when Martin was elected, Carter had left him $220,000 in uncollected fines. During his time in office Martin had assessed $1.1 million fines and collected $1.3 million. Martin has streamlined the court system reducing court sessions and paperwork. When you go into the voting booth, The Wentzvillian recommends pulling the trigger for Judge Steve Martin.

7 comments:

  1. Hays hasn't done anything on the board. He reminds me of Gooch when he was an alderman.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The court IS NOT a REVENUE SOURCE and should NEVER be treated like one. To suggest that it is shows a basic misunderstanding of courts anywhere. Of course I know Carter well and respect him because he is JUSTICE focused. The court IS NOT a REVENUE SOURCE and should NEVER be treated like one. How much money is raised by fining the public/defendants/guilty is irrelevant. The municipal court is meant for behavior modification within city limits (and beyond) and NOT RAISING REVENUE. I very much doubt the current judge would appreciate you ascribing such judiciary activities to him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Judge Martin ascribed the court's judiciary activitied himself—in a public meeting before the Board of Aldermen. Watch the City video, you can ascribe it yourself!

      Delete
    2. Scott G. is correct that the court should not be a revenue source but it does generate the revenues to pay for the justice system. when Judge Carter (in the name of justice) indiscriminatly lowered fines that were set by ordinance and cut fines for others it created a financial burdon on taxpayers. Where is the justice in that? Lady Justice can be as blind as she wants but taxpayers have enough burdon, let the guilty pay their share.

      Delete
  3. How can the Mayor get away with appointing some one to an alderman position when the people had no voice in his appointment. Havn't hear anyone in Ward 3 say anything positive about Mr. Hays and in fact have heard negatives that when he was on the PlanninG/Zoning Board he was not pro-business and stiffledbusinesses from wanting to be in the City. People need to start checking his voting record for when he was on the PZ board.
    Did he really vote to have the White Castle on Wentzviklle Pkwy to be the Beige Castle???

    ReplyDelete
  4. Once again the Wentzvillian is shifting gears away from the city's greatest deficit - CEO of the City. As said before I waited for the CEO or Mayor 2013 Goals and not a peep from him. Someone needs to take this guy's cell phone away from him in meetings - he is lost. Rumors I received this weekend was Mayor has ordered the new administrator to take out the city's purchasing guy. Any truth to that? Is this the next person to get booted from the city. Wentzvillian you posted few articles back on relatives of ceo getting city contracts - then nothing. Are you going to follow through or was that not true.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do not believe that Wentzville's Purchasing Director is in danger of being relieved of his position.

      Regarding the mayor's relationships with certain service providers and/or contractors, everything is a matter of public record.

      Delete