With no meeting this week I feel an overwhelming need to keep recalling the Board of Alderman meeting of February 8th. That meeting has to go down in history as the most entertaining, controversial, and insightful Wentzville meeting of the 21st century. If you were a regular follower of City meetings over the years and watched closely, you'd see things that would frighten a hard-tail mule into relieving himself on the kitchen floor.
City government is clever—taxpayers are exploited by a complete lack of public interest while government merely continues with business as usual. Since the Wentzville Union and Wentzville Journal moved out of town there has been little or no unedited critical reporting of our government. The Suburban Journal, Newstime, Community News and Patch.com are for the most part fluffy and refuse to do any investigative reporting. The St. Louis Post Dispatch, however, has no problem digging into difficult topics of a controvrersial nature and scaring the horse pucky out of those involved.
This "blog;" (The Wentzvillian), as well as a private citizen, was kicked in the cod-piece in a public meeting by AldermanNick Guccione for telling the truth about what's going on in city hall. Perhaps, the things here are too close to the truth and finally the mayor and aldermen know that their ethics, actions and ability to handle taxpayers money responsibly are being closely monitored by The Wentzvillian.
City government is clever—taxpayers are exploited by a complete lack of public interest while government merely continues with business as usual. Since the Wentzville Union and Wentzville Journal moved out of town there has been little or no unedited critical reporting of our government. The Suburban Journal, Newstime, Community News and Patch.com are for the most part fluffy and refuse to do any investigative reporting. The St. Louis Post Dispatch, however, has no problem digging into difficult topics of a controvrersial nature and scaring the horse pucky out of those involved.
This "blog;" (The Wentzvillian), as well as a private citizen, was kicked in the cod-piece in a public meeting by Alderman
The Wentzvillian has reported on several occasions the subject of: "Implied Contracts," defined: "...checks being cashed without supporting documentation." When Alderman Chris Gard turned one of these cashed checks over to the city attorney; Paul Rost, my interest was piqued. Gard asked: Why didn't the contract follow the check? This is troubling for a number of reasons; the check was cashed, there is no paperwork, and no legitimate address for the company." I know that the company in question is; Westplex Sports and Entertainment L.O.C. (Local Organizing Committee). In researching this company, I found that it was created by Ed Watkins of Winning Endeavors and from the 2006 election flyer of Mayor Paul Lambi I found the following bullet point:
- "Board Member and founder to LOC (Local Organizing Committee); first in this area; this committee focuses on bringing large sports and entertainment events to this area. This Committee is located in Wentzville and represents St. Charles County, Franklin, Warren, and Washington."
I remember these meetings when Lambi led the Lurchettes (Bill Schuette, John Luby, Peggy Meyer, and Nick Guccione) down la-la lane, gleefully skipping hand-in-hand singing Kumbaya, to pass a resolution to give his organization $15,000. Lambi promised a new world-class velodrome and balloon races to equal those in St. Louis. None of these things materialized and now the organization may not even exist. This may have been a neat and noble pipe-dream but why didn't the Lurchettes investigate its probability or its corporation? The answer is simple, this group of so-called aldermen were in Disneyland and passed anything they didn't have to read or think about. What was the money used for and where is it?
The only possible reason this check was turned over to Rost is; to find the money and who and how Wentzville was relieved of $15,000 without a trace. In my humble opinion: there is only one of two men who has the money, either Mayor Lambi or Ed Watkins. Other questions are: Who endorsed the check? What did Wentzville receive for fifteen large? And, have more chickens come home to roost? It's very troubling that the same two individuals have connection with yet another complication which has been given to our city attorney for investigation. I am pleased to see Alderman Gard has the snarglees to make more noise than a jackass in a tin barn and bring this matter to light seeking to make the perpetrator skin his own skunk.
who did endorse the check, Lambi?
ReplyDeleteHe may be in a river of excrement in a native American water vessel without a means of propulsion...Again
ReplyDeleteAre we ever going to know who cashed the check, or is this another hush hush deal? This whole thing stinks, somebody needs to pay up. Who is Ed Watkins anyway?
ReplyDeletegoogle ed watkins & westplex....guess who comes up...lambi!!! we need more info. from this investigation.... someone find out!!!
DeleteCould you please do a fully "Investigative" piece on Mayoral Candidate Tow? He has told more people/citizens 2 to 3 (or even 4 and 5) different versions of his issue-opinions on a regular basis than I have ever witnessed of one human being. Tow is a "tell them what they wanna hear" kind of candidate AND, again, it is ever changing depending on the message-recipients. I implore you to please pursue this if you truly think -- as mentioned above -- that too many journalists re SOFT. This is your chance to show off your "investigative " bonafides as you will quickly find many many persons to attest to TOW's two-face (can 't think if more polite on-the-money way to state it) politicking style.
ReplyDeleteI have posted your comment and had not heard the things you describe that people are saying about Leon Tow.
DeleteIn the context of your comment, you described probably 90 percent of candidates running for any office, I can't get excited by political rhetoric. If Tow were to do, or has done anything unethical or illegal, and you can prove it, I'll dig in, but I see nothing here to report on.
I suggest you gather these people and bring them to "Candidates Night,' sponsord by the Chamber of Commerce. There they can ask questions of the candidates.
The Wentzvillian will not campaign for or against Leon Tow or Darrel Lackey. Bill Schuette and Nick Guccione are two of the biggest losers ever to disgrace City Chambers, and I will dig up every bit of trash they do and report it for the good of Wentzville. There are only two qualified candidates running for mayor, Leon Tow and Darrel Lackey.
Regarding Anonymous's question about who Ed Watkins is: Ed is a promoter who has made part of his living by pushing for various sports projects and facilities. He was one of the driving forces for the Family Arena and the TR Hughes Ballpark, and I think he was involved with the RecPlex and the Hyland Performance Center at Lindenwood. Ed used to work for Lindenwood as fundraiser, but hasn't for some time now. His approach is pretty much standard. He finds an idea and then promotes it, getting people excited about it. Then he gets contracts to keep on promoting the idea. He was probably trying to do the same thing with the Velodrome idea. His reputation is not the best: usually his clients feel like they paid for very little performance, which is why he is constantly having to find new ideas. I don't know if he is a crook, but he is a bit of a flim-flam or huckster or whatever. He is kind of a throwback to pioneer days where you'd have a traveling show peddling magix elixirs. The salesman typically had to leave town quickly to avoid being tarred and feathered,once people figured out the elixir wasn't magic.
ReplyDeleteis it against the law for an elected city official to accept monies for his company while in office? how do we get answers? i want answers!!!
DeleteI would contact the election ethics board.
DeleteI've been giving some thought to your question, I think it could definately be a conflict of interests just because he introduced it to the board and surely received some if not all of the money given by the city.
Delete