Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Guccione Lesson #1 — Bailing Water Using A Drill

 
There's a regular Board of Alderman meeting tomorrow (Wednesday October 23, 2013) evening, and after reading the agenda I laughed out loud. If you'll remember at the last meeting, President of the Board, Rick Stokes, made a point of criticizing Mayor Nickolas Guccione for not controlling the meetings, saying; one-thirty in the morning was way too late to be ending. This problem has become standard practice, indicative of Guccione's leadership in, and outside of the meetings.
 
Item "3. (ID # 4850) Discuss to Set an End Time to Board of Aldermen Meetings." After looking at the board packet I read that this item was brought forward by Guccione. He really doesn't understand that he is the problem, not the size of the agenda.
 
Guccione has a habit of allowing citizens to talk and debate Bills and Resolutions. He can't quite grasp the simple fact that there is a business section of the meeting, and those citizens who attend the meeting are only spectators. Knowing him, I can understand his logic: Nickolas Guccione is political, he's always on the campaign trail. His philosophy is not in the best interest of the city, it's in the best interest of himself and those he supports during elections. He truly doesn't understand that he's going to piss-off some people simply because he's doing the job he was elected to do.
 
At the last meeting there were at least half-a-dozen citizens who spoke in "Open Forum," and at "Public Hearings." The problem came when those same people were encouraged to speak again during "Bills and Resolutions," not once but several times — each. Guccione actually allowed debate between the audience and petitioner during the business portion of the meeting.
 
I've attended a lot of board meetings of various cities around the county, and never once have I seen a mayor allow citizens to speak during the business portion of the meeting, unless it was to request an ambulance. On average, members of the audience are allowed three-to-five minutes to speak during public portions of the meeting. At the end of their time they are cut off whether they had finished or not, and they are not allowed to speak on any one item more than once. At St. Charles County meetings, the public is put on a timer and they have two minutes to make their point, period, then the hammer comes down and it's adios amigo.
 
The bottom line is, Guccione wants to put a time limit on the overall meeting when he needs to put a time limit on the speakers. What he's proposing will not work and I think the aldermen may tell him that tomorrow. He may actually wish he'd never put it on the agenda.
 
Now we come to Item "XIV. Information/Discussion," paragraph "2. (ID # 4858) Professional Services Committee." You remember when Aldermen Cheryl Kross led Sonya Shryock and Micheal Hays down the yellow brick road to having our legal services team drop their briefs and quit. After Guccione joined this rag-tag band of mutineers, the city has been scrambling to figure out what to do.
 
The discussion will be what to do about the all volunteer committee that now refuses to spend countless hours evaluating professional service companies because Guccione and his gaggle of groupies just reject their findings. I think it could be an enjoyable discussion for observers.
 

 * * * * *
 

The City just posted an amended agenda, and it seems that our crackerjack Mayor Guccione just ex afficioed himself into another committee mess. Under "New Business," paragraph "3. (ID # 4856 Financial Audit Service." The city just received a letter from their CPA; Allen, Gibbs, and Houlik, L.C., stating (in part), "... effective immediately, we withdraw from the contract and will not conduct the external audits for the City for 2013 or 2014. ..." hence, now the City is once again scrambling to replace yet another professional services company.
 
There was a discussion during the last Board of Aldermen meeting where it was decided not to pay a sum of $12,000 for additional "out of scope" work performed by the auditors under a verbal agreement. Guccione who is ex afficio of the audit committee didn't seem to remember any verbal agreement so rather than pay it, it was decided not to. I contest that Guccione naps through financial meetings, leaving it to others, I wonder who's gonna get a spanking this time?
 
The list of high-level employees who have left the City is enormous and now the CPA can be added to Legal Services on the list of professional services companies who no longer want to be involved with Guccione's brand of Wentzville. Does anyone hear the rumblings of "recall, recall, recall," out there on the streets. Incompetence must be rewarded and who better to reward with a recall? — Mayor Nickolas Guccione. His ship has taken on more water and he's using a drill to bail it out.
 

11 comments:

  1. I say bring the hammer down on the gooch and then call an ambulance for him. If he is not taken out of office sooner rather than later I hate to think of what will become of Wentzville.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Disgusted With GuccioneOctober 22, 2013 at 8:10 PM

    I agree! Since the aldermen can't, or won't do anything, when are the taxpayers going to do something about this seemingly incompetent mayor? People love this City and when I was a kid, my elders took care of people who disrespected it. It's time to take care of getting Mayor Guccione out of office. The way things are going and at the rate employees and contractors are leaving the City, he'll be the only one left to turn out the lights.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why is setting a time limit on the agenda? The only possible reason is so Nicky Boy can get some free lessons on how to run a meeting. God, what an idiot!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gooch got gavel lessons from Mayor Lambi and after a year and a half, he's almost got that part down. But as far as telling potential voters to shut up and sit down at the meetings, that's not happening, EVER!

      Delete
  4. Can you imagine the stress levels of the city employees? They should all be given a reward for hanging in there with all this BS from our 'leaders'.. Lets remember to support and encourage them if and when we have encounters with the employees.

    ReplyDelete
  5. A thought... Maybe the four year Mayoral term was a mistake. It's likely that a fast growing city results in poorly informed voters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The four year term for Wentzville is a disaster. Lambi pushed for it thinking he would get re-elected and pushed it through before he got into hot water and decided not to run. The Aldermen thought it was such a good idea that they tried to get it for them too.

      Frankly, I don't know why after 160 years of two-year terms it seemed necessary to change it. If elected officials are good at what they do, they will be re-elected, if they are bad, they can be disposed of.

      They all claimed that campaigning got in the way of City business when election time rolled around. They thought it better to only have to go through the expense once every four years.

      Nickolas Guccione is a perfect example for having two year terms. I think a lot of Aldermen would agree with that statement today, and regret putting a four-year term on the ballot.

      Delete
    2. Campaigning and city business should be kept separate. Anyone employed by the city should be doing their job and campaigning on their time, not the city's. Expenses could be cut by running a clean campaign on the issues. Anyone that violates the law while campaigning, such as Nick did by using the city logo, should be dropped from the ballot and the next highest vote gets the job. If Nick couldn't obey the law while campaigning, why on earth does anyone think he will represent or run the city in a legal manner? He needs to keep his day job as a chicken butcher and stop butchering the City of Wentzville. He's already gutted the city. If he isn't stopped he will be chopping off the legs next. He dumped legal counsel so the alderman would not have legal help in getting him out of office. He is disgusting.

      Delete
  6. That is not at all the way i remember the mayors term being extended to 4 years. I seem to remember Cheryl Kross bringing it up. This was at a time that Kross, stokes, van sample and tow were all voting as block. Lambi had announced that he wasn't running again and the group wanted Tow to win the mayoral seat. That way the group of Kross, Van Sample and Stokes would have their guy as the mayor. Lambi would have had no vote for the extension. I remember Kross and Stokes walking along with Leon Tows float in the parade and thinking this can't be legal.... Long story short.. Leon tow didn't win..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I disagree, I spoke with Paul Lambi in his first term and he wanted to change it to a four year term then. Also, at that time the Mayoral seat was between Aldermen Kross and Tow, Tow won the coin toss. This information was provided to me by Kross prior to filing for the Mayor position.

      Delete
  7. One Question: Is it possible that the City could return to a two-year term for mayor?

    ReplyDelete