Friday, May 16, 2014

The Brain Trust Speaks!

 
The Wentzville Board of Aldermen meeting last Wednesday, May 14, 2014 was about what I had expected—uneventful. With three new aldermen sitting in on their first full meeting, and the absence of the incessantly-questioning Alderman Cheryl Kross, it went pretty quick, (even though it was a fairly large agenda) ending just after 8:00pm. Had Kross been there, given her elevated status; Board President and her usual nit-picking nonsensical-minutia of questions, the meeting could have easily gone on for another hour or two.
 
I can forgive the mistakes of the new aldermen when trying to adapt to meeting procedure for their first couple of months, but when they interject self-serving questions and statements during their inaugural meeting, they've crossed their representative line. The brain trust who was elected to replace one of Wentzville's finest aldermen Rick Stokes, Ms. Linda Wright has shown herself to be interested in herself and the subdivision in which she lives. Judge for yourself:
 
Under section; "Community Development, (ID # 5171) Public Hearing - Pete Murtaugh of Ranken Technical College, applicant on behalf of the property owner, Terry Nelson Carpenter's District Council of Greater St Louis, is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a Technical or Trade School for Ranken Technical College. The site is located on the west side of Par Road, approximately 1,400 feet north of Highway A. 14-35-PZ"
 
When the reality that Ranken might actually come into Wentzville several years ago, Mayor Nickolas Guccione had designs on becoming mayor, Union hack that he is, he opposed every vote that was ever taken on this matter. After he was elected, it was rah-rah-rah for Ranken. The only time he spoke during the public hearing was to give a shout-out for his Union bros.
 
Wright was another story. When the Ranken representative displayed the site plan of the proposed new school, he also noted "future expansion," which is of an indefinite time frame — could be one year, could be ten years, maybe never, depending upon growth of the program. Mr. Murtaugh made this clear to everyone, except our brain-trust Alderman Wright. He explained the site plan; "if this future development" takes place, they would require a curb-cut on Mexico Road. That's when Ms. Wright thought it necessary to take exception. "Where is this on Mexico Road," she asked? So, with the help of staff, Mr. Murtaugh answered her question. Wright looked away towards the mayor and said, "We are very happy with Mexico Road right now?" 
 
As many of you may know, Ms. Wright lives just off of Mexico road. Could it be that she doesn't want growth that may impede her trips to WalMart, bringing more traffic onto her beloved Mexico road? It reminds me of the Lurchettes some years back when they ran for alderman seats to stop the building of subdivisions adjacent to theirs because it ruined their views of the beautiful woods they could see from their decks. It didn't work for them, and it won't work for you. For some reason this city has become growth-crazy and that snowball was pushed down the hill some twenty years ago—get used to it! At any rate, I see a lot of self-serving in her future on the Board of Aldermen. Her lack of knowledge about this city and it's government is astounding, but after all, some of you have decided that she is the best-of-the-best, and elected her to represent us in Ward 3—Thanks!

Ms. Wright, knowing that you work at the Obamacare facility here in Wentzville, you aren't one of those employees who sat around collecting a Federal paycheck and did nothing, and currently being investigated by Claire McCaskell, are you? Please divulge this information to your constituents at a public meeting. In the name of open government it should be on the record who we elected, don't you think?
 
* * * * *
 
Alderman Chris Gard took the lead on making 90 percent of the motions last Wednesday, and we should be so proud of Michael Hays who set a great example of how to raise one's hand to second 95 percent of Gard's motions. Way to go Mr. Hays, you have become the pride of Ward 3. With two of Guccione's brain-trusts sitting on the board it's going to be like watching a sideshow. God, Ward 3 is in deep #?*@!
 
* * * * *
 
About the big lawsuit; there have been lengthy executive session meetings held after the last two regular alderman meetings. I figured it was regarding the lawsuit brought by Chief Lisa Harrison, and it was confirmed last night when it was probably requested by King Nickolas that Alderman Michael Hays should lock the door to the chamber, Hey, there's something else he can do. I guess it was so Chief Lisa Harrison wouldn't be sneaking around back there to see if she could hear anything—incredible!
 
According to CaseNet; an attorney, Mr. Mathew Justin Gist of Kansas City, was contracted by the City to defend the City of Wentzville, Mayor Nickolas Guccione, Alderman Cheryl Kross, ex-Alderman Sonya Shryock, and Lieutenant Dale Dothage of the Wentzville police department.
 
Taken from the web: "Mr. Gist specializes in the representation of employers in employment and labor disputes. He has obtained successful jury verdicts and summary judgments in employment discrimination cases including claims for wrongful termination in both state and federal court. Mr. Gist has argued several cases in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and Missouri Court of Appeals for the Western District. He routinely represents private companies as well as cities and counties in employment and personnel matters. In July of 2010, Mr. Gist successfully obtained one of the few defense verdicts in an employment discrimination case filed in the Jackson County Circuit Court."
 
This is going to be an extremely high-dollar trial for Wentzville taxpayers to shuck out, if any part of these allegations are found to be true, heads need to roll. I have a suggestion where to start but I'm wondering which of these people named in the lawsuit are going to roll over on the King? Is it possible that maybe one of them could cut a deal? Stay tuned, the fun has just begun.
 

7 comments:

  1. I really like your new poll. I hope people choose those who they truly believe will lose, and not just those they really want to lose.

    I guess this big-shot, big-city attorney the city has secured for defense will be charging lots of per diem plus a hefty hourly rate. What happens if during the course of the trial it's found that any of the defendants had gone outside their job description or area of responsibility within the scope of their position with the city?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That would an awfully big ... UH-OH! Looks like some may be refinancing their homes, draining their kids college fund, and maybe looking into how much the rent is at the trailer park.

      Delete
  2. It would not surprise anyone to have someone in the police department roll over on the king and his court. The Chief and her alliances have more long range power than the local king and his court over the folks with law enforcement background in the state and elsewhere fi they want to succeed here or elsewhere is our bet.
    Good Luck!

    ReplyDelete
  3. the Mayor made complete fool of himself at the SPLASH STATION opening this past Thursday night when he included to ask EX mayor Lambi to join him at the ribbon cutting ceremony in front of everyone there. We all know the Mayor owes EX mayor Lambi for his pardoning for his sins but does he have to keep on reminding the citizens of his indebtiness to EX mayor Lambi..
    Come on now, what is he trying to do. Lambi needs to be long gone and pay for his sins of guilt according to his judgement under state rulings.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I copied and pasted the following from CaseNet. What does it mean, is the defense attorney admitting guilt and wanting to settle?

    05/16/2014 Motion Filed
    Dft s Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings Under Missouri Rule 55 27 b and Suggestions in Support; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
    Filed By: MATTHEW JUSTIN GIST
    On Behalf Of: CITY OF WENTZVILLE, MISSOURI, NICHOLAS GUCCIONE, CHERYL KROSS, SONYA SHRYOCK, DALE DOTHAGE

    Entry of Appearance Filed
    Entry of Appearance; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
    Filed By: MATTHEW JUSTIN GIST

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 55.27. Defenses and Objections - How Presented - By Pleading or Motion - Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

      (a) How Presented. Every defense, in law or fact, to a claim in any pleading, whether a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, shall be asserted in the responsive pleading thereto if one is required, except that the following defenses may at the option of the pleader be made by motion:

      (1) Lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter,

      (2) Lack of jurisdiction over the person,

      (3) That plaintiff does not have legal capacity to sue,

      (4) Insufficiency of process,

      (5) Insufficiency of service of process,

      (6) Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted,

      (7) Failure to join a party under Rule 52.04,

      (8) That plaintiff should furnish security for costs,

      (9) That there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause in this state,

      (10) That several claims have been improperly united,

      (11) That the counterclaim or cross-claim is one which cannot be properly interposed in this action.

      Delete
    2. I cast my vote for number 9.

      Delete